I believe that Sage and Eitzen's use of the Olympics as a site for political demonstrations and violence is best connected with this incident, specifically with Eric Rudolph's motive behind the crime. Because Rudolph felt that our government was depriving him of something, he took direct action to demonstrate backlash against the government. The authors suggest that "sport and sporting events were used by revolutionaries and reformers to attack racism and American involvement in Vietnam" (203). Instead of attacking racism and our war in Vietnam, Rudolph had been attacking abortion laws in the US.
I disagree with the idea that sport is pure and free of politics. After all, professional sport and Olympic sport are multi-billion dollar industries in which the stakeholders wish to be paid the appropriate amount. However, I will say that early on, sport may have been more pure relative to today's sport industry; nevertheless, it has always been a business and will continue to be affiliated with politics.
Overall great post! However, I am curious as to your statement regarding Olympic athletes wanting to be paid appropriate amounts? Since Olympic athletes are not paid for winning or loosing medals, do you believe that the athletes in the games are only playing to be paid or are they doing it for the personal pride of representing there country?
ReplyDelete-Alex Hiser